Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through
links on Gadgetspotr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and
servers) on.
Learn more
118
Highlights
23
Differences
5
Reactions
0
Likes
SHARGE Pixel 140
vs
Anker Prime 160W:
118 Highlights & 23 Differences —
So, Which Charger Actually Works Better
Learn key differences in size, power output, and features in this detailed comparison.
Choosing the better charger? This comparison shows SHARGE Pixel 140 vs Anker Prime 160W side by side — from usb-c ports, wireless charging power, cable length & interchangeable plugs to what users love.
Plug Insertion Cycles: High
Indicates how many plug-in and unplug cycles the charger connector is designed to withstand before wear affects performance.
with 2 points higher
SHARGE Pixel 140 vs Anker Prime 160W: Compact GaN Chargers with Different Priorities
The SHARGE Pixel 140 and the Anker Prime 160W are both GaN-based wall chargers designed for modern USB-C devices, including laptops, tablets, and smartphones. On paper, they share a lot: each supports USB Power Delivery, PPS, and fast charging protocols, and both feature three USB-C ports with dynamic power distribution. They also rely on passive cooling with internal heat sinks, operate within a 32–104°F operating temperature range, and are certified under UL, CE, FCC, and RoHS standards for electrical safety and compliance. The core difference comes down to output ceiling, ecosystem support, warranty coverage, and price positioning.
With a 140 Watt maximum output power, the Pixel 140 already sits in high-performance territory for laptop charging. The Anker Prime steps up to 160 Watt, giving it a measurable edge for multi-device scenarios or power-hungry notebooks. At the same time, the SHARGE model is currently listed at $79.9 at Sharge.com, while the Anker Prime 160W holds steady at $149.99 across major retailers. That price gap alone shapes much of this comparison.
SHARGE Pixel 140: Performance Value in a Compact Shell
The SHARGE Pixel 140 focuses on delivering high wattage at a more accessible price. Its 140 Watt ceiling, combined with intelligent power allocation, allows it to balance output across three USB-C ports dynamically. For users charging a laptop and two smaller devices at once, that dynamic distribution can help maintain stable performance without abrupt throttling. The charger also maintains excellent voltage and current regulation, with low ripple and noise, which contributes to charging stability for sensitive electronics.
Thermally, the Pixel 140 uses passive heat dissipation with an internal heat sink and supports a 176 °F thermal throttling threshold. That slightly higher threshold compared to its rival may allow it to sustain output longer before reducing power under heavy loads, though both units are rated for stable sustained performance. It is also fully fanless at 0 dB noise level, which is ideal for quiet office or bedside environments.
From a usability standpoint, the Pixel 140 includes LED indicators for status feedback and a foldable plug for travel convenience. It supports laptop, tablet, smartphone, and wearable charging, and it does so with broad cross-brand compatibility. While it lacks Energy Star certification and a proprietary protocol layer, it does include Quick Charge and PPS support, making it versatile across Android and Apple ecosystems.
Where SHARGE makes a strategic compromise is in long-term support. The charger carries a 1 Year warranty, and support channels are limited to email and an online portal. For many buyers, that may be sufficient, but it does not match the extended coverage offered by its competitor. Still, considering the nearly half-price positioning, the value equation remains compelling.
Anker Prime 160W: Higher Output and Broader Ecosystem Support
The Anker Prime 160W positions itself as a more premium solution, starting with its 160 Watt maximum charging speed. That extra 20 Watt headroom may not matter for a single ultrabook, but it can become relevant when powering multiple high-draw devices simultaneously. The charger also integrates a proprietary protocol layer in addition to standard USB PD and PPS, which may improve optimization with certain branded devices.
Physically, the Prime 160W is labeled Ultra-Compact and measures 2.56 inches wide, 2.05 inches deep, and 1.38 inches high, with a weight of 0.48 lbs. These defined dimensions make it easier to assess fit in tight power strips or travel bags. Like the Pixel, it features reinforced USB-C ports, V-0 fire-retardant housing, and multi-layer safety redundancy, including overheat, overcurrent, and short-circuit protection.
One clear advantage is compliance and efficiency validation. The Anker Prime 160W includes Energy Star compliance, signaling independently verified energy efficiency standards. While both chargers maintain 0.3 watts of standby power consumption and high power efficiency, Energy Star certification can matter in enterprise or environmentally conscious settings.
Support coverage is another differentiator. The Prime 160W comes with a 2-year warranty and expanded support channels, including chat, email, and online portal access. That additional year of coverage may offer more long-term reassurance, especially for users who rely on a single high-output charger daily.
Although it lacks visible LED indicators, the Prime retains solid indicator behavior and foldable plug convenience. It also lists a global regulatory region profile, making it potentially more adaptable for international buyers compared to region-specific variants.
Quick Take
The SHARGE Pixel 140 stands out for delivering 140 watts of high-speed charging at a significantly lower price, making it a strong value-driven choice. The Anker Prime 160W counters with a higher 160 Watt output, Energy Star certification, and a longer 2-year warranty. Both are capable, stable, and well-protected GaN chargers, but they target slightly different priorities.
Bottom Line
If your goal is maximizing value while still getting high-wattage USB-C charging for laptops and multiple devices, the SHARGE Pixel 140 makes a strong case. If you prefer higher output headroom, extended warranty coverage, and Energy Star validation, the Anker Prime 160W may justify its premium pricing. The decision ultimately depends on whether you prioritize cost efficiency or incremental performance and support advantages.
Verdict
Winner: SHARGE Pixel 140 → Delivers 140 Watt performance, dynamic power allocation, and strong safety features at nearly half the price.
Runner-up: Anker Prime 160W → Offers higher 160 Watt output, Energy Star compliance, and a longer 2-year warranty for buyers seeking added assurance.
Release Year differs: SHARGE Pixel 140 was released in 2024 while Anker Prime 160W launched in 2025, suggesting Anker may include slightly newer technology or improvements.
The year the charger model was first released to market.
In the battle of Release Year,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
higher
68 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Release Year on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Mounting Style
What is the mounting style?
68
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
Wall-Mounted
30
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
Desktop
SHARGE Pixel 140
Wall-mounted mounting style means the device is designed to be affixed to a wall surface, saving space and improving accessibility.
Anker Prime 160W
Mounting style is desktop, meaning it is designed for use on tabletops or desks rather than wall mounting.
Indicates how the charger is physically positioned during use.
In the battle of Mounting Style,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
higher
38 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mounting Style on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Installation Type
How is the charger installed?
48
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
Plug-In
40
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
Plug-In
SHARGE Pixel 140
Installation type is plug-in, meaning it connects directly to a power outlet without complicated setup.
Describes how the charger is installed or connected.
In the battle of Installation Type,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Installation Type on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Product Form Factor
What is the product form factor?
48
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
Compact
70
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
Ultra-Compact
SHARGE Pixel 140
The compact product form factor facilitates easy transport and discreet placement in various environments.
Describes the overall physical form and size profile of the charger.
In the battle of Product Form Factor,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
22 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Product Form Factor on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Product Name
What is the product name?
67
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
78
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
vs
Product Name
The Product Name distinguishes SHARGE Pixel 140 from Anker Prime 160W, clearly identifying each model. SHARGE Pixel 140 is the 2024 model, while Anker Prime 160W is released in 2025, making the latter a slightly newer choice for buyers.
Official product name used to identify the charger model.
In the battle of Product Name,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
11 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Product Name on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Charger Type
What type of charger is this?
48
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
Wall Charger
30
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
Wall Charger
Defines the primary charger category based on form and usage.
In the battle of Charger Type,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
higher
18 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charger Type on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Technology
What charging technology does it use?
88
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
GaN
90
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
GaN
vs
Charging Technology
Both SHARGE Pixel 140 and Anker Prime 160W employ GaN (Gallium Nitride) charging technology, which enhances efficiency and heat management, providing reliable high-speed charging performance.
Indicates the core technology used to deliver power efficiently.
In the battle of Charging Technology,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Technology on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Intended Use
What is the intended use of this charger?
31
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
Home, Office, Travel
50
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
Home, Office, Travel
Describes where and how the charger is primarily intended to be used.
In the battle of Intended Use,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
19 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intended Use on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Device Compatibility
What devices are compatible with this charger?
78
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
Laptop
84
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Accessory
Indicates the types of devices the charger can power.
In the battle of Device Compatibility,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
6 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Device Compatibility on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Compatibility Notes
Are compatibility notes clearly provided?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
No
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
Indicates whether additional compatibility limitations or requirements are clearly disclosed.
In the battle of Compatibility Notes,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
higher
38 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Compatibility Notes on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Power Source
What is the power source?
68
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
AC Outlet
60
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
AC Outlet
Defines where the charger draws its power from.
In the battle of Power Source,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Source on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Usage Environment
Where can this charger be used?
58
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
Indoor
20
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
Indoor
vs
Usage Environment
Usage Environment for SHARGE Pixel 140 and Anker Prime 160W is Indoor, indicating both products are suited for indoor use, ensuring safe and optimal charging conditions at home or office.
Specifies the environments where the charger is designed to operate.
In the battle of Usage Environment,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
higher
38 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Usage Environment on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Regulatory Region
Which regulatory regions does it support?
28
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
US, EU, UK
100
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
Global
Indicates the regions where the charger meets regulatory standards.
In the battle of Regulatory Region,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
72 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Regulatory Region on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
User Level
What user level is this charger designed for?
0
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
Beginner
0
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
Beginner
vs
User Level
User Level for both SHARGE Pixel 140 and Anker Prime 160W is set to Beginner, making both chargers equally accessible and user-friendly for first-time or casual users.
Describes the technical experience level required to use the charger effectively.
In the battle of User Level,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 160W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
User Level on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Certifications
What certifications does this charger have?
76
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
UL, CE, FCC, RoHS
54
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
UL, CE, FCC, RoHS, Energy Star
Lists official safety, quality, and compliance certifications held by the charger.
In the battle of Certifications,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
higher
22 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Certifications on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Maximum Output Power of SHARGE Pixel 140 is 140W compared to 160W for Anker Prime 160W. The 20W higher power of Anker offers faster charging potential, suiting demands for quicker device charging.
The highest total power the charger can deliver to connected devices.
In the battle of Maximum Output Power,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
20.0 Watt
measurement.
Based on community votes for Maximum Output Power,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Anker Prime 160W ◉,
which got 1 votes.
Output Voltage is equal at 5V for both SHARGE Pixel 140 and Anker Prime 160W, ensuring consistent voltage supply suitable for a wide variety of USB-powered devices.
The voltage supplied to connected devices during charging.
In the battle of Output Voltage,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
equal
5.00 Volt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Voltage on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Short Circuit Protection is present on both SHARGE Pixel 140 and Anker Prime 160W, providing essential safety measures against electrical faults and improving user safety.
Automatically shuts down power if a short circuit is detected.
In the battle of Short Circuit Protection,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Short Circuit Protection on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Minimum Output Power
What is the minimum output power?
5
Watt
0Votes
5
Watt
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
The minimum output power is 5 Watts, which is sufficient for charging smaller devices like smartphones or wearables.
Anker Prime 160W
Minimum output power is 5 Watt, sufficient for trickle charging or powering small accessories.
The lowest stable power output supported by the charger.
In the battle of Minimum Output Power,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
equal
5.00 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Minimum Output Power on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Input Voltage
What input voltage does it support?
100
Volt
0Votes
100
Volt
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
Input voltage of 100 Volts denotes compatibility with common AC supply voltages in many regions.
Anker Prime 160W
Input voltage rating of 100 Volt implies compatibility with standard household AC power in many regions.
The voltage range required from the power source to operate safely.
In the battle of Input Voltage,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
equal
100.00 Volt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Voltage on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Output Current
What is the output current?
3
A
0Votes
3
A
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
Output current of 3 Amperes supports rapid charging for devices requiring higher current levels.
Anker Prime 160W
The output current per port can reach 3 Amperes, sufficient for rapid charging of most smartphones and tablets.
The maximum current delivered to devices for charging.
In the battle of Output Current,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
equal
3.00 A
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Current on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Standby Power Consumption
How much power is used on standby?
0.3
Watt
0Votes
0.3
Watt
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
The charger consumes only 0.3 Watts in standby, demonstrating energy-efficient design to minimize power waste when idle.
Anker Prime 160W
Standby power consumption is very low at 0.3 Watt, reflecting energy-saving design when idle.
Power consumed when the charger is plugged in but not actively charging.
In the battle of Standby Power Consumption,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
equal
0.30 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Standby Power Consumption on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Input Frequency
What input frequency is supported?
50
Hz
0Votes
50
Hz
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
Input frequency is 50 Hz, standard for many global electrical grids.
The electrical frequency range the charger can accept.
In the battle of Input Frequency,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
equal
50.00 Hz
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Frequency on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Voltage Regulation
How good is the voltage regulation?
98
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
Excellent
90
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
Excellent
SHARGE Pixel 140
Voltage regulation is excellent, maintaining output voltage stability under varying load and input conditions.
Indicates how well output voltage remains stable under varying load conditions.
In the battle of Voltage Regulation,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voltage Regulation on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Peak Power Handling
What peak power can it handle?
140
Watt
0Votes
160
Watt
0Votes
vs
Peak Power Handling
Peak Power Handling is 140W on SHARGE Pixel 140 and 160W on Anker Prime 160W, mirroring their max output wattage. Anker's higher peak offers more robust peak charging performance.
The maximum short-term power the charger can safely handle.
In the battle of Peak Power Handling,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
20.0 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Peak Power Handling on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Input Current
How much input current does it draw?
2.5
A
0Votes
2
A
0Votes
vs
Input Current
Input Current is 2.5A for SHARGE Pixel 140 and 2A for Anker Prime 160W, meaning SHARGE Pixel 140 draws slightly more current, which might affect power consumption and charging speed nuances.
The amount of current drawn from the power source during operation.
In the battle of Input Current,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
higher
0.5 A
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Current on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Power Efficiency
How efficient is the charger?
98
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
High
100
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
High
Indicates how effectively input power is converted into usable output power.
In the battle of Power Efficiency,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Efficiency on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Power Factor
What is the power factor?
98
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
High
100
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
High
Indicates how efficiently electrical power is drawn from the power source.
In the battle of Power Factor,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Factor on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Current Regulation
How good is the current regulation?
78
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
Excellent
67
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
Excellent
Indicates how consistently current is controlled during charging.
In the battle of Current Regulation,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
higher
11 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Current Regulation on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Load Regulation
How good is the load regulation?
98
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
Excellent
100
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
Excellent
Measures output stability as load increases or decreases.
In the battle of Load Regulation,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Load Regulation on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Ripple & Noise
How much ripple and noise is present?
98
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
Low
100
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
Low
Indicates the level of electrical noise present in the output.
In the battle of Ripple & Noise,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ripple & Noise on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Surge Protection Rating
How strong is the surge protection?
98
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
Advanced
100
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
Advanced
Indicates the strength of protection against voltage spikes.
In the battle of Surge Protection Rating,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Surge Protection Rating on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Overcurrent Protection
Is overcurrent protection included?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
Prevents damage by limiting excessive current flow.
In the battle of Overcurrent Protection,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overcurrent Protection on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Overvoltage Protection
Does it prevent overvoltage?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
Protects devices from excessive voltage output.
In the battle of Overvoltage Protection,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overvoltage Protection on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Heat Management Efficiency is rated High for both SHARGE Pixel 140 and Anker Prime 160W, ensuring devices stay cool under load and protect components from overheating.
Measures how effectively heat is managed during charging.
In the battle of Heat Management Efficiency,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat Management Efficiency on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Idle Charging Behavior for both SHARGE Pixel 140 and Anker Prime 160W is Standby mode, helping reduce power consumption when devices are not actively charging.
Describes behavior when a device is fully charged but still connected.
In the battle of Idle Charging Behavior,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
higher
58 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Idle Charging Behavior on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Maximum Charging Speed
What is the maximum charging speed?
140
Watt
0Votes
160
Watt
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
Maximum charging speed is 140 Watts, suitable for fast charging laptops and other high-power devices.
Anker Prime 160W
Maximum charging speed is 160 Watt, suitable for rapid charging of laptops and power-hungry devices.
The highest charging power delivered to a single device.
In the battle of Maximum Charging Speed,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
20.0 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Maximum Charging Speed on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Speed
What is the charging speed category?
88
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
Ultra-Fast
100
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
Ultra-Fast
SHARGE Pixel 140
Charging speed is ultra-fast, greatly reducing time to charge compatible devices.
Classifies overall charging speed based on supported power and protocols.
In the battle of Charging Speed,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Speed on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Throttling Behavior
How does the charger throttle performance?
98
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
Gradual
100
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
Gradual
Anker Prime 160W
Throttling behavior is gradual, reducing power output slowly under high temperature or stress to prevent damage.
Describes how charging speed is reduced when limits are reached.
In the battle of Throttling Behavior,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Throttling Behavior on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Device Detection Accuracy
How accurate is device detection?
98
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
High
100
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
High
Anker Prime 160W
Device detection accuracy is high, enabling precise identification of connected devices for optimal charging.
Accuracy in identifying connected devices and their power needs.
In the battle of Device Detection Accuracy,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Device Detection Accuracy on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Simultaneous Device Charging
How many devices can be charged simultaneously?
28
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
3
45
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
3
vs
Simultaneous Device Charging
Simultaneous Device Charging capacity is 3 devices for both SHARGE Pixel 140 and Anker Prime 160W, allowing multi-device charging without compromising output distribution.
The maximum number of devices that can be charged at the same time.
In the battle of Simultaneous Device Charging,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
17 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Simultaneous Device Charging on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Power Distribution Method
How is power distributed?
88
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
Dynamic
100
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
Dynamic
vs
Power Distribution Method
Power Distribution Method is Dynamic for both SHARGE Pixel 140 and Anker Prime 160W, enabling intelligent power allocation across multiple connected devices for optimal charging.
Describes how power is allocated across multiple ports.
In the battle of Power Distribution Method,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Distribution Method on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Intelligent Power Allocation
Does it allocate power intelligently?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
Automatically adjusts power delivery based on connected devices.
In the battle of Intelligent Power Allocation,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intelligent Power Allocation on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Stability
How stable is the charging performance?
48
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
Stable
100
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
Stable
Reflects how consistent charging output remains over time.
In the battle of Charging Stability,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
52 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Stability on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Full Charge Time Estimate
How long does a full charge take?
Who knows?
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
74
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
1 hour
Estimated time required to fully charge a typical device.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Full Charge Time Estimate on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Consistency
Is charging speed consistent?
98
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
Consistent
100
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
Consistent
vs
Charging Consistency
Charging Consistency is described as Consistent for both SHARGE Pixel 140 and Anker Prime 160W, indicating stable power delivery and reliability during charging sessions.
Indicates how evenly charging speed is maintained throughout a session.
In the battle of Charging Consistency,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Consistency on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Adaptive Charging
Does it support adaptive charging?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
Adjusts charging patterns based on device needs and conditions.
In the battle of Adaptive Charging,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Adaptive Charging on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Startup Charging Delay
Is there a delay before charging starts?
No
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
No
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
Time taken before charging begins after a device is connected.
In the battle of Startup Charging Delay,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 160W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Startup Charging Delay on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum power delivered during wireless charging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Charging Power on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Interchangeable Plugs are not supported by either SHARGE Pixel 140 or Anker Prime 160W, limiting plug type flexibility for international travel.
Supports interchangeable plug heads for different regions.
In the battle of Interchangeable Plugs,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 160W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Interchangeable Plugs on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
USB-A Ports
SHARGE Pixel 140 has no USB-A Ports, while Anker Prime 160W's USB-A Ports value is n/a (unavailable). This difference might affect compatibility with older USB-A devices.
Number of traditional USB-A output ports.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB-A Ports on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Port Placement
Where are the ports located?
78
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
Front
80
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
Front
Anker Prime 160W
Ports are placed on the front, which allows easier access and cable management when in use.
Location of charging ports on the charger body.
In the battle of Port Placement,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Placement on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Port Labeling
Are the ports labeled?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
Anker Prime 160W
Port labeling is present to assist users in identifying correct ports for various devices and power requirements.
Indicates whether ports are clearly labeled for identification.
In the battle of Port Labeling,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Labeling on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Port Durability
How durable are the ports?
98
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
High
100
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
High
Anker Prime 160W
Port durability rated high denotes long-lasting port hardware capable of withstanding frequent device connections.
Expected resistance of ports to wear from repeated use.
In the battle of Port Durability,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Durability on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Connector Durability
How durable are the connectors?
88
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
High
100
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
High
Anker Prime 160W
Connector durability is rated High, indicating the ports are designed to withstand frequent plug and unplug cycles without failure.
Durability of the connector interface itself.
In the battle of Connector Durability,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Connector Durability on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Total Ports
How many total ports does the charger have?
60
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
3
40
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
3
Anker Prime 160W
Total number of ports is 3, making it suitable for multiple-device charging needs.
Total number of output ports available for charging devices.
In the battle of Total Ports,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
higher
20 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Total Ports on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Wireless Charging
Does it support wireless charging?
No
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
No
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
Indicates whether the charger supports wireless charging.
In the battle of Wireless Charging,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 160W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Charging on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Connector Type
What connector types are supported?
88
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
USB-C
90
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
USB-C
Types of connectors supported by the charger.
In the battle of Connector Type,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Connector Type on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Detachable Cable
Is the cable detachable?
No
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
No
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
Indicates whether the charging cable can be detached.
In the battle of Detachable Cable,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 160W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Detachable Cable on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Pass-Through Charging
Does it support pass-through charging?
No
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
No
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
Allows the charger to power devices while itself being powered.
In the battle of Pass-Through Charging,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 160W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pass-Through Charging on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Magnetic Alignment
Does it support magnetic alignment?
No
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
No
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
Supports magnetic alignment for easier device placement.
In the battle of Magnetic Alignment,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 160W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Magnetic Alignment on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Daisy-Chain
Can it be daisy-chained?
No
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
No
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
Allows multiple chargers or devices to be linked together.
In the battle of Daisy-Chain,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 160W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Daisy-Chain on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Port Power Priority
How is port power priority handled?
98
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
Auto
100
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
Auto
Determines how power priority is assigned among ports.
In the battle of Port Power Priority,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Power Priority on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
2.56
inch
0Votes
vs
Width
Width is unavailable for SHARGE Pixel 140 but 2.56 inches for Anker Prime 160W, giving Anker a clearer physical dimension metric to assess portability.
The horizontal measurement of the charger body from side to side.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Width on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
1.38
inch
0Votes
vs
Height
Height is unavailable for SHARGE Pixel 140 but 1.38 inches for Anker Prime 160W. Anker's physical height data aids in evaluating space needs, while SHARGE info is missing.
The vertical measurement of the charger from bottom to top.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Height on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
0.48
lbs
0Votes
vs
Weight
Weight is not available for SHARGE Pixel 140 but is 0.48 lbs for Anker Prime 160W. Without SHARGE's weight, Anker provides a lightweight option at under half a pound, supporting portability.
Total weight of the charger including built-in components.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Weight on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Thickness of the charging cable, affecting durability and flexibility.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Thickness on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Depth
What is the depth of the charger?
Who knows?
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
2.05
inch
0Votes
The front-to-back measurement of the charger body.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Depth on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Plug Profile Depth
How far does the plug stick out?
Who knows?
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
1.3
inch
0Votes
Depth of the plug profile when inserted into an outlet.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Plug Profile Depth on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Travel Size Classification
Is this charger travel-sized?
48
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
Compact
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Travel Size Classification
Travel Size Classification for SHARGE Pixel 140 is Compact, whereas Anker Prime 160W does not provide this classification (n/a), which may impact portability decisions.
Overall size category based on dimensions and portability.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Travel Size Classification on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Housing Material compositions are similar: SHARGE Pixel 140 uses Polycarbonate and Plastic while Anker Prime 160W lists Plastic and Polycarbonate, indicating comparable build materials focused on durability.
Primary material used for the outer charger casing.
In the battle of Housing Material,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
4 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Housing Material on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Scratch Resistance is Medium for both SHARGE Pixel 140 and Anker Prime 160W, meaning both products offer moderate protection against surface wear and tear.
Resistance of the surface to scratches and abrasions.
In the battle of Scratch Resistance,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Scratch Resistance on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Material Sustainability Level is Medium for both SHARGE Pixel 140 and Anker Prime 160W, reflecting an average commitment to eco-friendly materials and manufacturing processes.
Use of sustainable or environmentally friendly materials.
In the battle of Material Sustainability Level,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Material Sustainability Level on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Fire-Retardant Rating
What is the fire-retardant rating?
98
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
V-0
100
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
V-0
SHARGE Pixel 140
Fire-retardant rating V-0 reflects top-tier resistance to flame propagation for enhanced safety.
Anker Prime 160W
Fire-retardant rating of V-0 is the highest UL 94 classification, showing the plastic housing self-extinguishes quickly after ignition.
Fire safety rating of the charger materials.
In the battle of Fire-Retardant Rating,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fire-Retardant Rating on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Surface Finish
What is the surface finish?
68
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
Matte, Textured
60
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
Matte
SHARGE Pixel 140
The surface finish combines Matte and Textured elements, offering a visually appealing and tactile grip that reduces fingerprints and slipping.
Anker Prime 160W
The charger surface finish is matte, which helps reduce fingerprints and glare for a cleaner look.
External surface finish affecting grip and aesthetics.
In the battle of Surface Finish,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Surface Finish on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Plug Material
What material is the plug made of?
43
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
Metal, Plastic
80
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
Metal
SHARGE Pixel 140
Plug materials include metal and plastic, ensuring a balance of durability and electrical insulation.
Material used for the plug prongs and structure.
In the battle of Plug Material,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
37 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Plug Material on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Port Reinforcement
Are the ports reinforced?
98
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
Reinforced
100
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
Reinforced
SHARGE Pixel 140
Port reinforcement protects connectors from mechanical strain, increasing durability especially with frequent use.
Indicates whether charging ports are reinforced for durability.
In the battle of Port Reinforcement,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Reinforcement on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Heat-Resistant Materials
Does it use heat-resistant materials?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
vs
Heat-Resistant Materials
Heat-Resistant Materials are used in both SHARGE Pixel 140 and Anker Prime 160W, reinforcing thermal safety and improving overall durability during charging loads.
Uses materials designed to withstand high temperatures safely.
In the battle of Heat-Resistant Materials,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat-Resistant Materials on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Build Rigidity
How rigid is the charger build?
98
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
Solid
70
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
Solid
Overall structural stiffness of the charger body.
In the battle of Build Rigidity,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
higher
28 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Build Rigidity on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Moisture Resistance
Is it resistant to moisture?
0
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
None
0
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
None
Ability to withstand moisture exposure.
In the battle of Moisture Resistance,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 160W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Moisture Resistance on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Safety Redundancy Level is Multi-Layer for both SHARGE Pixel 140 and Anker Prime 160W, ensuring multiple protective features enhance user and device safety during charging.
Indicates the number of safety systems working together.
In the battle of Safety Redundancy Level,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Safety Redundancy Level on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Child Safety Shutter is absent (No) on both SHARGE Pixel 140 and Anker Prime 160W, which users with children should consider when prioritizing child safety features.
Prevents accidental insertion of objects into live ports.
In the battle of Child Safety Shutter,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 160W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Child Safety Shutter on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Fail-Safe Mode is included for both SHARGE Pixel 140 and Anker Prime 160W, activating shutdowns or protections when overheating risks occur for user safety.
Emergency mode that safely disables charging during extreme heat.
In the battle of Thermal Fail-Safe Mode,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Fail-Safe Mode on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Overheat Protection
Does it have overheat protection?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
Automatically reduces or shuts off power when excessive heat is detected.
In the battle of Overheat Protection,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overheat Protection on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Temperature Monitoring
Is temperature actively monitored?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
Continuously monitors internal temperature during operation.
In the battle of Temperature Monitoring,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Temperature Monitoring on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Fire Protection
Does it include fire protection?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
vs
Fire Protection
Fire Protection is confirmed as Yes on both SHARGE Pixel 140 and Anker Prime 160W, providing crucial safeguards against fire hazards.
Built-in measures to reduce fire risk during electrical faults.
In the battle of Fire Protection,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fire Protection on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Electrical Isolation
Is electrical isolation implemented?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
Separates high-voltage and low-voltage components for safety.
In the battle of Electrical Isolation,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Electrical Isolation on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Grounding
Does it support grounding?
No
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
No
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
Supports grounding to reduce shock and electrical interference.
In the battle of Grounding,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 160W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Grounding on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Anti-Spark Protection
Does it have anti-spark protection?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
Reduces sparking when plugging or unplugging devices.
In the battle of Anti-Spark Protection,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Anti-Spark Protection on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
EMI Protection
Is EMI protection included?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
Protects against electromagnetic interference affecting nearby electronics.
In the battle of EMI Protection,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
EMI Protection on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
ESD Protection
Is ESD protection supported?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
Shields the charger from electrostatic discharge damage.
In the battle of ESD Protection,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
ESD Protection on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Shut-Off
Does it shut off automatically?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
Automatically cuts power when unsafe conditions are detected.
In the battle of Auto Shut-Off,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Shut-Off on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Fault Detection
Can it detect electrical faults?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
Detects abnormal electrical conditions during operation.
In the battle of Fault Detection,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fault Detection on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Protection Response Time
How fast does protection activate?
88
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
Instant
59
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
Instant
vs
Protection Response Time
Protection Response Time is Instant for both SHARGE Pixel 140 and Anker Prime 160W, ensuring immediate reaction to power anomalies and enhancing safe operation.
Time taken for protection systems to activate during a fault.
In the battle of Protection Response Time,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
29 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Protection Response Time on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Safety Certification Level
What is the safety certification level?
98
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
Premium
100
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
Premium
Overall strength of safety certifications achieved.
In the battle of Safety Certification Level,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Safety Certification Level on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
49
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
Qi
vs
Wireless Charging Standard
Wireless Charging Standard is not supported (n/a) on SHARGE Pixel 140 but is Qi standard on Anker Prime 160W, giving Anker a clear edge if wireless charging is desired.
Specifies the wireless charging standard supported.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Charging Standard on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Backward Compatibility is Yes for both SHARGE Pixel 140 and Anker Prime 160W, allowing the use of older devices without issues, increasing versatility.
Maintains compatibility with older charging standards and devices.
In the battle of Backward Compatibility,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Backward Compatibility on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Cross-Brand Compatibility is Universal on both SHARGE Pixel 140 and Anker Prime 160W, ensuring wide-ranging device support from different manufacturers.
Level of compatibility across different device brands.
In the battle of Cross-Brand Compatibility,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cross-Brand Compatibility on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
USB Power Delivery
Does it support USB Power Delivery?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
Indicates support for the USB Power Delivery standard for fast and flexible charging.
In the battle of USB Power Delivery,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB Power Delivery on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Quick Charge
Does it support Quick Charge?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
Indicates compatibility with Qualcomm Quick Charge technology.
In the battle of Quick Charge,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Quick Charge on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
PPS
Does it support PPS?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
Supports Programmable Power Supply for efficient fast charging.
In the battle of PPS,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
PPS on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Apple Charging
Is it compatible with Apple devices?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
Optimized compatibility with Apple devices and charging requirements.
In the battle of Apple Charging,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Apple Charging on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Android Charging
Is it compatible with Android devices?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
Ensures compatibility with Android devices and charging protocols.
In the battle of Android Charging,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Android Charging on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Wearable Charging
Can it charge wearables?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
Supports charging of wearables like smartwatches or earbuds.
In the battle of Wearable Charging,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wearable Charging on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Proprietary Protocol,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Proprietary Protocol on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Throttling Threshold is higher on SHARGE Pixel 140 at 176°F compared to 167°F on Anker Prime 160W, meaning SHARGE tolerates slightly higher temps before speed reduction.
Temperature at which charging power is reduced to prevent overheating.
In the battle of Thermal Throttling Threshold,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
higher
9.0 °F
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Throttling Threshold on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Loss as Heat is Low on both SHARGE Pixel 140 and Anker Prime 160W, reflecting efficient energy use that minimizes wasted heat generation.
Percentage of input energy lost as heat during charging.
In the battle of Energy Loss as Heat,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
higher
22 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Loss as Heat on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Sustained Load Temperature Stability is Stable for both SHARGE Pixel 140 and Anker Prime 160W, suggesting reliable performance under prolonged charging without overheating issues.
Temperature stability during prolonged high-load charging.
In the battle of Sustained Load Temperature Stability,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sustained Load Temperature Stability on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Dissipation Method
How does it dissipate heat?
28
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
Passive
20
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
Passive
vs
Thermal Dissipation Method
Thermal Dissipation Method is Passive for both SHARGE Pixel 140 and Anker Prime 160W, relying on non-mechanical heat transfer which is quieter and more reliable.
Method used to release heat during operation.
In the battle of Thermal Dissipation Method,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Dissipation Method on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Cooling Design
What internal cooling design is used?
88
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
Heat Sink
70
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
Heat Sink
SHARGE Pixel 140
Internal cooling uses a heat sink to dissipate heat effectively without mechanical fans, enhancing reliability and quiet operation.
Internal structure designed to manage heat.
In the battle of Internal Cooling Design,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
higher
18 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Cooling Design on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Operating Temperature Range
What is the operating temperature range?
78
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
32–104°F
70
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
32–104°F
The temperature range within which the charger operates safely.
In the battle of Operating Temperature Range,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Operating Temperature Range on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Storage Temperature Range
What is the storage temperature range?
68
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
-4–140°F
95
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
-4–158°F
Temperature range safe for storing the charger when not in use.
In the battle of Storage Temperature Range,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
27 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Storage Temperature Range on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Fanless Design
Is the charger fanless?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
Indicates whether cooling is achieved without a fan.
In the battle of Fanless Design,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fanless Design on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Ambient Temperature Tolerance
How tolerant is it to ambient temperatures?
78
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
High
100
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
High
Ability to perform in varying ambient temperatures.
In the battle of Ambient Temperature Tolerance,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
22 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ambient Temperature Tolerance on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Altitude Operating Range
What altitude can it operate at?
0
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
Sea level–10,000 ft
9
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
Up to 10,000 ft
Maximum altitude at which the charger operates reliably.
In the battle of Altitude Operating Range,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Altitude Operating Range on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Plug Orientation is Straight on both SHARGE Pixel 140 and Anker Prime 160W, ensuring a straightforward plug design that fits standard wall sockets easily.
Orientation of the plug relative to the charger body.
In the battle of Plug Orientation,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
22 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Plug Orientation on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Cable Management is External for both SHARGE Pixel 140 and Anker Prime 160W, so cable organization relies on user solutions rather than built-in mechanisms.
How the charging cable is managed when not in use.
In the battle of Cable Management,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Management on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Travel Friendly is Yes for both SHARGE Pixel 140 and Anker Prime 160W, endorsing suitability for portability and use on the go, a key factor for travelers.
Designed for easy transport and use while traveling.
In the battle of Travel Friendly,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Travel Friendly on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Daily Use Convenience is High for both SHARGE Pixel 140 and Anker Prime 160W, indicating practical design and user-friendly features for everyday charging tasks.
Overall convenience during everyday use.
In the battle of Daily Use Convenience,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Daily Use Convenience on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Indicator Behavior
How do the indicators behave?
18
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
Solid
20
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
Solid
SHARGE Pixel 140
Indicator behavior is solid, meaning LEDs show continuous light for clear status indication without blinking distractions.
How indicator lights behave during operation.
In the battle of Indicator Behavior,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Indicator Behavior on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Setup Complexity
How complex is setup?
88
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
Plug-and-Play
70
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
Plug-and-Play
SHARGE Pixel 140
Setup complexity is minimal due to plug-and-play design, allowing immediate use without advanced configuration.
Effort required to start using the charger.
In the battle of Setup Complexity,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
higher
18 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Setup Complexity on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Foldable Plug
Does it have a foldable plug?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
Indicates whether the plug can fold for easier storage and travel.
In the battle of Foldable Plug,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Foldable Plug on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
User Feedback Method
How does it provide user feedback?
68
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
LED
30
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
LED
Methods used to communicate status to the user.
In the battle of User Feedback Method,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
higher
38 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
User Feedback Method on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
One-Hand Operation
Can it be operated with one hand?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
Allows easy plugging and unplugging with one hand.
In the battle of One-Hand Operation,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
One-Hand Operation on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Maintenance Requirements
Does it require maintenance?
98
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
None
100
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
None
Level of maintenance needed to keep the charger functioning well.
In the battle of Maintenance Requirements,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Maintenance Requirements on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Firmware Upgradable
Can the firmware be updated?
No
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
No
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
Indicates whether the charger firmware can be updated.
In the battle of Firmware Upgradable,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 160W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Firmware Upgradable on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
How durable is the charging cable under repeated bending?
Who knows?
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
99
Anker Prime 160W
1Votes
High
vs
Cable Flex Cycles
Cable Flex Cycles is n/a for SHARGE Pixel 140 but High for Anker Prime 160W, suggesting Anker’s cable durability is rated for extensive bending and usage.
Indicates how many bending cycles the charging cable can withstand before performance degradation.
Based on community votes for Cable Flex Cycles,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Anker Prime 160W ◉,
which got 1 votes.
Mean Time Between Failures is High for both SHARGE Pixel 140 and Anker Prime 160W, indicating reliable operation and lower chances of malfunctions during typical use.
Average reliability level indicating how often failures are expected.
In the battle of Mean Time Between Failures,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mean Time Between Failures on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Environmental Stress Resistance is Medium for both SHARGE Pixel 140 and Anker Prime 160W, meaning average resilience against environmental factors like humidity and temperature changes.
Ability to withstand heat, humidity, and other stresses.
In the battle of Environmental Stress Resistance,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Environmental Stress Resistance on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Manufacturing Quality Level is Premium for both SHARGE Pixel 140 and Anker Prime 160W, reflecting top-tier build quality standards for durable chargers.
Overall manufacturing quality classification.
In the battle of Manufacturing Quality Level,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Manufacturing Quality Level on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Long-Term Stability
How stable is long-term performance?
98
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
Stable
100
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
Stable
SHARGE Pixel 140
Long-term stability ensures consistent performance over extended use, indicating robust design and component quality.
Performance consistency over extended use periods.
In the battle of Long-Term Stability,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Long-Term Stability on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Plug Insertion Cycles
How durable is the plug connection over time?
98
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
High
100
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
High
Indicates how many plug-in and unplug cycles the charger connector is designed to withstand before wear affects performance.
In the battle of Plug Insertion Cycles,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Plug Insertion Cycles on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Port Wear Resistance
How resistant are the ports to wear?
98
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
High
100
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
High
Resistance of charging ports to wear over time.
In the battle of Port Wear Resistance,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Wear Resistance on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Reliability Certification
Is reliability certified?
Yes
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
Indicates whether reliability has been independently certified.
In the battle of Reliability Certification,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Reliability Certification on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Power Loss Rating is Low for both SHARGE Pixel 140 and Anker Prime 160W, meaning minimal power is lost during conversion and delivery, enhancing efficiency.
Indicates the amount of input power lost during conversion and operation.
In the battle of Power Loss Rating,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Loss Rating on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Efficiency Rating is High on both SHARGE Pixel 140 and Anker Prime 160W, ensuring less wasted power and more cost-effective charging over time.
Overall classification of how efficiently the charger converts power.
In the battle of Energy Efficiency Rating,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Efficiency Rating on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Carbon Footprint Category is Medium for both SHARGE Pixel 140 and Anker Prime 160W, reflecting moderate environmental impact during production and usage.
Estimated environmental impact from production and use.
In the battle of Carbon Footprint Category,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Carbon Footprint Category on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Saving Features are Yes for both SHARGE Pixel 140 and Anker Prime 160W, helping reduce environmental impact through optimized power use.
Built-in features designed to reduce energy consumption.
In the battle of Energy Saving Features,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Saving Features on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Star Compliance
Is it Energy Star compliant?
No
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
Indicates compliance with Energy Star efficiency standards.
In the battle of Energy Star Compliance,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Star Compliance on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Standby Efficiency
How efficient is the charger in standby mode?
98
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
High
100
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
High
Indicates how efficiently the charger uses power while plugged in but not actively charging.
In the battle of Standby Efficiency,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Standby Efficiency on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Green Materials Usage
Are green materials used?
No
0Votes
SHARGE Pixel 140
No
0Votes
Anker Prime 160W
Uses environmentally friendly or recycled materials.
In the battle of Green Materials Usage,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 160W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Green Materials Usage on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
70
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
Email, Chat, Online Portal
vs
Support Channels
Support Channels include Email and Online Portal for SHARGE Pixel 140, while Anker Prime 160W adds Chat too, offering more direct communication options for customer support.
Ways users can contact customer support.
In the battle of Support Channels,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
17 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Support Channels on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Warranty Length differs: SHARGE Pixel 140 offers 1 Year, whereas Anker Prime 160W provides 2 Years, giving Anker a longer guarantee period for peace of mind.
Duration of warranty coverage provided with the charger.
In the battle of Warranty Length,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
22 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Warranty Length,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Anker Prime 160W ◉,
which got 1 votes.
I like the longer warranty length that Anker offers at 2 years which feels more secure than SHARGE's 1 year. It's just peace of mind for me.
See more
Replacement Policy
What is the replacement policy?
78
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
Standard Returns
20
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
Standard Returns
vs
Replacement Policy
Replacement Policy is Standard Returns for both SHARGE Pixel 140 and Anker Prime 160W, providing basic return and replacement services without special conditions.
Defines the terms under which a defective or faulty charger can be replaced.
In the battle of Replacement Policy,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
higher
58 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Replacement Policy on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Customer Support Availability
When is customer support available?
38
SHARGE Pixel 140
0Votes
Business Hours
40
Anker Prime 160W
0Votes
Business Hours
vs
Customer Support Availability
Customer Support Availability is limited to Business Hours for both SHARGE Pixel 140 and Anker Prime 160W, meaning users should reach out during regular office times for help.
Availability of customer support services.
In the battle of Customer Support Availability,
SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 160W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Customer Support Availability on SHARGE Pixel 140 ◉
vs Anker Prime 160W ◉ and help others decide!
Surveys
Because hot takes deserve votes.
Charging Speed
How satisfied are you with the charging speed of this chargers when powering everyday devices?
Extremely fast charging — Under 1 hour
0Votes
0Votes
Very fast charging — 1 to 2 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Decent charging speed — 2 to 4 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Slow charging — 4 to 6 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Very slow charging — Over 6 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Power Output Performance
How well does this chargers provide enough power for phones, tablets, or laptops?
Handles high-demand devices easily — 65 watts or more
0Votes
0Votes
Strong and reliable output — 45 to 64 watts
0Votes
0Votes
Good for most daily devices — 25 to 44 watts
0Votes
0Votes
Limited power capability — 10 to 24 watts
0Votes
0Votes
Very weak power delivery — Under 10 watts
0Votes
0Votes
Durability and Build Quality
How durable does this chargers feel during long-term daily use?
Feels built to last a long time — Over 5 years
0Votes
0Votes
Very solid and dependable — 3 to 5 years
0Votes
0Votes
Decently built for regular use — 2 to 3 years
0Votes
0Votes
Feels somewhat fragile — 1 to 2 years
0Votes
0Votes
Breaks down too quickly — Under 1 year
0Votes
0Votes
Portability and Size
How easy is it to carry this chargers for travel or commuting?
Ultra compact and pocketable — Under 3 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Light and travel friendly — 3 to 5 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Moderately easy to carry — 5 to 7 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Somewhat bulky — 7 to 10 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Heavy and inconvenient — Over 10 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Heat Management
How well does this chargers control heat during extended charging sessions?
Stays cool even under heavy use — Under 90 degrees Fahrenheit
0Votes
0Votes
Gets slightly warm — 90 to 100 degrees Fahrenheit
0Votes
0Votes
Noticeably warm to the touch — 100 to 110 degrees Fahrenheit
0Votes
0Votes
Runs quite hot — 110 to 120 degrees Fahrenheit
0Votes
0Votes
Uncomfortably hot — Over 120 degrees Fahrenheit
0Votes
0Votes
Ease of Use
How easy is it to use this chargers on a daily basis?
Effortless and intuitive — No learning needed
0Votes
0Votes
Very easy to understand — Minimal effort
0Votes
0Votes
Takes a little getting used to — Some adjustment
0Votes
0Votes
Slightly confusing at times — Requires patience
0Votes
0Votes
Frustrating to use — Feels complicated
0Votes
0Votes
Setup Experience
How smooth is the initial setup experience with this chargers?
Instantly ready to use — Plug and charge
0Votes
0Votes
Quick and simple setup — Less than 1 minute
0Votes
0Votes
Setup takes some attention — A few minutes
0Votes
0Votes
Setup feels awkward — Several minutes
0Votes
0Votes
Setup feels annoying — Too many steps
0Votes
0Votes
Design and Visual Appeal
How attractive does the design of this chargers look in everyday environments?
Sleek and modern look — Feels premium
0Votes
0Votes
Clean and stylish design — Looks nice
0Votes
0Votes
Simple and acceptable — Nothing special
0Votes
0Votes
Somewhat unattractive — Feels dated
0Votes
0Votes
Cheap-looking design — Not appealing
0Votes
0Votes
Noise and Comfort
How comfortable is this chargers to use in quiet environments?
Completely silent operation — No noise at all
0Votes
0Votes
Almost silent — Barely noticeable
0Votes
0Votes
Occasionally noticeable — Slight sound
0Votes
0Votes
Clearly noticeable noise — Can be distracting
0Votes
0Votes
Annoyingly loud — Very disruptive
0Votes
0Votes
Pricing and Value
How do you feel about the price of this chargers compared to what it offers?
Supermod
Moderator
Recaptor
